Today I visited the National Gallery of Art to see the exhibit, “In The Darkroom: Photographic Process before the Digital Age”. The exhibit was located in the West Building on the ground floor in Galleries 30-32. I thought the placement of the exhibit could have been better because it was located in the middle of the 19th century impressionist paintings, where it looked out of place. The galleries are also cramped and feel tight. In the East Building of the National Gallery there are contemporary exhibits featuring the works of Andy Warhol, Roy Lichtenstein, and Jasper Johns and I feel that the photography exhibit would have been better suited to be located there.
I really enjoyed this exhibit. I have always been fascinated by photography before digital technology because I believe that computer technology is easier to use than possessing a gifted and creative eye for good shots. I was fascinated by the earliest works in the exhibit, some which dated back to the early 1830’s and 1840’s. The earliest photographic works were created using a process known as “Photogenic Drawing”. I was amazed at how much I learned from the exhibit. I never knew that images could be reproduced on substances other than paper. One of the earliest photographic processes was known as cyanotype. It was based using the light sensitivity of iron salts rather than silver salts and consists of a one-layer photographic structure where the image is embedded in the fibers of the support and then produces a print with a matte surface. Cyanotypes usually consisted of reproducing images of flowers or plants. The exhibit had an example of this process with one of Anna Atkins works known as “Ferns, Specimen of Cyanotype” from the 1840s.
Perhaps my favorite photograph in the exhibit was a piece entitled “An Angel Unwinged by Your Desire” by Julia Margaret Cameron from 1873. It featured a naked child and is an example of the collotype process, which was known for its high quality printing. I was drawn to this photograph because the photographer used clouding to give an “other worldly” or “angelic” feel to the child.
I was pleasantly surprised to see that the exhibit featured a work by favorite photographer, Diane Arbus. Her photograph “A Young Man in Curlers at Home on West 20th Street, N.Y.C. 1966” (which I included in my review) was displayed. Although only one of her photographs was displayed, I was happy that they showed her contribution to the world of photography.






